Deposing the Defendant DriverCharles G. Monnett III I. Introduction One of the most critical phases of auto related litigation is the deposition of the defendant driver. A well planned, properly executed deposition can greatly enhance the chance of successfully concluding any personal injury case arising from a motor vehicle collision. This article will discuss the goals to be achieved during the deposition of the defendant driver as well as techniques for reaching those goals. II. Why depose the Defendant? The defendant's deposition should be taken in any case, regardless of size, where liability remains an issue. It is recommended that the defendant driver be deposed in every case. It is certainly possible to learn about the basic facts of a case without deposing the defendant driver. However, interrogatories clearly have their limitations. With interrogatory responses no conclusions can be drawn about the effectiveness of the defendant as a witness. When interrogatories are served the responses received are essentially the defense attorney's sanitized version of events. It may be difficult to determine if important facts have been omitted from an interrogatory answer. A deposition allows the free flow of information from he defendant to the plaintiff's attorney without the filtering effect of the defense attorney's influence. III. Goals-Purpose There are at least three primary goals the plaintiff's attorney should keep in mind while preparing for the deposition of the defendant driver. They are: 1) to gain information about the defendant and the facts of the case; 2) to neutralize any defenses asserted by the defendant; and 3) to avoid surprises at trial. A. Gain Information What type of information can we learn about the defendant by taking the deposition of the defendant driver that cannot be gained from interrogatories or other forms of discovery? First, taking a deposition enables plaintiff's counsel to assess the overall appearance and to gauge the jury's reaction to the defendant. Does the defendant make a good impression or a poor one? Are they physically attractive? Are there visible tattoos, body piercing, or other attributes of their appearance that may be offensive to some jurors? How do they dress? What is their demeanor? Are they friendly or aggressive? In short, is the defendant someone the jury will be inclined to like and believe? How will the jury view the defendant as compared to the plaintiff? Which is the typical juror likely to identify with? How good a witness is the defendant? Are they articulate? Do they make good eye contact? Is the defendant able to explain their version of events in a way that is understandable and believable? Will they stick to their version of the facts when pressured or do they waiver when challenged? The appearance, demeanor and effectiveness of the defendant as a witness are certainly factors that must be considered when evaluating any case for settlement and when preparing for trial. The only way to make an accurate assessment of a defendant's overall appearance and poise under pressure is to depose them. The defendant's background should be carefully explored. A complete and accurate description of the events surrounding the collision must be obtained. At the end of this paper there is an outline that contains various topics to explore and suggested questions. Unfortunately, I am not able to give credit to the original author as I cannot recall where I first obtained this outline but it may have been posted on one of the ATLA list serves. It contains many useful questions and topics. I have modified the original outline to add some additional areas of questioning. Every deposition of a defendant driver should include topics designed to identify other potential defendants or sources of insurance coverage. What was the purpose of the trip the defendant was making at the time of the wreck? Were they performing any errand on behalf of a business or individual? How many vehicles do they own? Are there other family members living in the household that own vehicles that are insured? Have they purchased umbrella coverage? Always question the defendant about their observations of the plaintiff at the scene of the wreck. The defendant may prove to be a good source of information about the plaintiff's injuries and damages. For example, in a traumatic brain injury case the defendant may establish that the plaintiff lost consciousness for a period of time or was dazed or confused following the impact. The defendant may have observed that the plaintiff was in pain or was bleeding after the collision. Another area that should be covered is the defendant's response to the specific allegations in the complaint. Inquire as to the factual basis for the defendant's denial of each allegation of negligence. If requests for admission have been served and denied, inquire about the factual basis for each of those denials as well. B. Neutralize defenses I practice in a state that still has contributory negligence as a defense. Because contributory negligence is a complete bar to recovery, it asserted as a defense in almost every motor vehicle case, including rear end collisions. For example, in a recent case where the defendant ran into the rear of the plaintiff's car at a traffic light the defendant alleged that the plaintiff was contributorily negligent because he "failed to warn" her that he was going to stop when the traffic light turned yellow. Many times the individual defendant is unaware of the defenses that have been asserted by their insurer's attorney. In my experience it is not unusual for a defendant to express surprise that there is a claim that the plaintiff is somehow to blame for what occurred. I will often ask the defendant: "Tell me in your own words why this wreck is the plaintiff's fault" or "Explain the factual basis for your claim that the plaintiff failed to keep a proper lookout." I go through each defense asserted in the answer and ask the defendant to explain the factual basis for that defense. A typical response is "I don't know" or "I never said the plaintiff caused this wreck." The deposition can then be used in support of a motion to strike the defenses from the answer. C. Avoid surprises at trial No one likes surprises at trial. Avoiding unexpected surprises at trial should be a priority at every deposition. It is essential to explore the facts of the wreck and the events leading up to it thoroughly at deposition. Begin with broad based questions such as "Tell me what you remember about the scene of the wreck" and then narrow the focus to insure no details are missed. Follow up detailed questions with another broad question such as: "Have we talked about everything you can remember about the events at the scene of the wreck?" It is essential that every interaction the defendant had with the plaintiff be covered thoroughly. Make sure that all conversations with the plaintiff are recounted in detail. "Tell me the exact words you recall the plaintiff said to you when you first spoke with her after the wreck." III. Technique A. Develop your own style Like most aspects of litigation, it is essential to develop your own deposition style. Some attorneys prefer an aggressive, confrontational style to deposition questioning while others prefer a more friendly, conversational approach. I believe that the style of questioning depends on the nature of the deponent and the facts of the case. I tend to use the aggressive, confrontational approach when the deponent is a young man for instance. If I was deposing an older woman, a softer, more conversational style would be employed. The more egregious the facts, the more aggressive I would be with the deponent. Some attorneys prefer to begin with an explanation of the deposition process and then a series of easy questions to establish rapport with the witness. Their goal is to get the witness as comfortable as possible with the hope that the witness will be more forthcoming with information if they are comfortable with the process and like the questioner. This approach works well with some witnesses. An alternative style is to hit the witness with the hardest questions you can think of right from the beginning. The goal is to gain as many concessions or admissions from the witness as is possible before they become comfortable with the process. In most motor vehicle cases the defendant driver will be sitting for their first deposition. They will tend to be nervous and apprehensive about the process. They are afraid of what they may be asked. In my opinion, the witness will be more likely to reveal damaging information or make key concessions while they are still figuring out how the process works. In cases were liability is disputed I try to hit the witness hard with the first question. "Why did your car collide with the plaintiff's?" "It is true isn't it, that there was nothing the plaintiff could have done to avoid this wreck and that it was your fault?" B. Have a plan It is important to have a plan at the outset of the deposition. Careful planning is essential to ensure that all needed information is obtained. Make a check list of important facts you want to establish, admissions you want to obtain or key areas that you need to explore. In some instances it is appropriate to write out specific questions you wish to ask. If you do write out all of the deposition questions in advance be careful not to get too dependent on the list. I generally do not proceed in chronological order when deposing a defendant driver. I jump from topic to topic in an attempt to get the witness flustered, confused or uneasy. "Where were you going when the wreck happened? How many vehicles do you own? It is true, is it not that you were traveling 65 mph in a 55 speed zone when the wreck occurred? Where do you work?" etc. C. Do not blindly follow the plan While it is important to have a plan at the outset of the deposition it is equally important to recognize when to abandon the script. Do not become so tied to the list of questions that you fail to listen to witness' answers and to follow-up when appropriate! The deposition may take unexpected twists or turns. Follow those unexpected changes when necessary. D. Use video Video tape the deposition. Reading a transcript at trial is no substitute for having the jurors see it for themselves. In addition, some witnesses will become nervous when the camera is on. When nervous, they are more likely to make mistakes and provide useful information. I simply take a video camera to the deposition, set it up on a tripod, push the record button and let it run. I use a remote omnidirectional microphone which is placed on the table in front of the witness for the sound. I have had very good success with this simple, inexpensive set up. There are many uses for the video. It can be synchronized with the typed transcript for easy editing and use in trial. It can also be used as part of a mediation presentation, video settlement brochure or shown to a focus group. The small cost associated with videotaping is easily outweighed by the potential benefit. IV. Conclusion With careful preparation, proper technique and a well thought out plan the deposition of the defendant driver can be the difference between success and failure in a motor vehicle collision case. The cost of the deposition of the defendant driver is easily outweighed by the benefits that can be gained. Any case worth the time, expense and effort required for a jury trial certainly justifies the small additional cost of obtaining the defendant driver's deposition. DEFENDANT DRIVER I. DEFENDANT - Identifying Information 1. Full Name II. DEFENDANT - Medical History 1. Diseases previously suffered from and when III. DEFENDANT - Military background 1. Have you ever served in any branch of the service, whether active duty or reserves IV. DEFENDANT - Educational history 1. What is extent of education V. DEFENDANT - Employment Background 1. Present Employment and salary VI. DEFENDANT - Financial Status 1. Have you ever filed bankruptcy? What Chapter? When? VII. DEFENDANT - Criminal history 1. Any convictions for felony or misdemeanor violations? VIII. DEFENDANT - Vehicle information 1. Describe all vehicles owned by you or in your household IX. DEFENDANT - Prior accidents 1. Describe prior automobile accidents by dates, locations X. DEFENDANT - Insurance information 1. Name, address, policy # and policy limits of present policy of automobile liablity coverage XI. DEFENDANT - Scene of wreck
XII. DEFENDANT--conduct and actions after wreck
Your Choice of Lawyer Can Have a Lasting Impact—Choose Carefully Charles G. Monnett III & Associates |










